I can’t predict with 100% conviction. Nobody does. History tells us that the first two initial years of any new elected American president are always problematic. When taken in isolation, we could see a scenario where this is countermanded by President-elect Obama’s planned stimulus, but given the potent combination of flagging earnings and slowing U.S. growth. However I don’t see a lot hope in this regard.
On the other side many analysts are saying that the mid of next year can see the revival of market. First, since the 1970s, the time between the first and last market lows in any given bear market is an average of seven to eight months. If historical trends hold true, this suggests we could see a bottoming out by the middle of next year. That’s consistent and plausible, especially since other data shows U.S. recessions, on average, last 14.6 months – which also points to a bottoming out in late spring or early summer.
I think that most important of all is people are hoping for something good to happen till mid of next year, reality can be quite opposite. Literally, Small investors have fled the stock markets in droves, and so far they’ve yanked more than $175 billion from the markets, with nearly 50% of that coming out during October alone. Granted, this is a mere 3.2% of the $5.5 trillion invested in stock market funds, according to Forbes, but it’s the first year that net equity flows have been negative since … a drum roll please … 2002. In 1987, stock market crash caused the Dow to drop 508 points in one day, which was a loss of 22.6 percent of value. The causes for this crash were supposed to be the weak values of dollar and sudden disappearance of foreign investors. In 2000, the stock market crashed again when the dot-com-bubble burst and highly inflated Internet and tech companies lost their value all at once. The total amount of value that tech companies lost that year came to an estimated $800 billion.
In 2008 and 2007, again American economy is on the edge of loosing big bucks once again, going towards a big economic crash. This time, the economy was brought to the brink by something called the sub prime mortgage. The federal government has made several efforts to keep the markets from falling. But despite the government's efforts to prevent another stock market crash, in theory, a free market society isn't supposed to have any intervention in its economy. So you can imagine how bad things would have to get for the government to step in.
Can Government Help?
Since the economy is said to be the free market economy so government can directly influence the market when its too down. However stock market affects the overall economy of the country and so government take steps in peripheral means to help the market, not directly making influences. The actions taken by government do affect the market a lot. So American government has taken many steps in this year, 2008 for the help of economy get stable. Government ensured that they would inject the money in economy if the form of tax rebate checks which make $600 per tax payer. In this way they wanted buyers to spend more on goods to help economy in revival.
Government also tries to help economy by giving cash in to banking institutes. In America, government uses Federal Reserve Bank (the Fed), the network of independent, government-related banks. That standardizes, regulates and aids commercial banks. In 2008, the Fed announced that it had created a new lending arm: the Term Securities Lending Facility (TSLF). The TSLF would offer $200 billion in loans to non-deposit banks only (not your neighborhood branch bank). What was so significant about the TSLF was that it accepted debts as securities .In other words, banks saddled with subprime mortgage-backed securities could use the very same investments that got them into trouble as collateral on 28-day loans from the Fed. The main objective of all these moves was to increase the liquidity of market, hence attracting more and more people to do their business by buying and selling in the stock market of America.
Future-2009……
U.S. economy is likely to post 0.9 per cent negative growth in 2009, Japan will contract by 0.1 per cent and European economies by 0.5 per cent. Uncertain projections leading into 2009 "point to a protracted downturn," with recovery not likely before the second half of next year "Even more worrying, the full impact of the financial crisis still has to unfold," said Carsten Brzeski, an analyst with ING Financial Markets. "If you think today's numbers are already bad, just wait for the next quarter."
The OECD's projections assume that the financial stress since the banking crisis exploded in mid-September will prove to be "short-lived" but be followed by an "extended period of financial headwinds" through the end of next year, with conditions then returning to near normal. But emerging hazards such as further failures of financial institutions, emerging market economies being hit harder by the downturn in global trade and foreign investors turning even more risk shy could make the recovery take even longer.
However as a caution I am giving you three options which will work in 2009, let’s hope they do so… The continuous de-leveraging of hedge funds and other financial institutions. 2ndly much more of the problems related to credit-default-swap. 3rd can be the unpredictable situations going on with U.S and global economy.
There are still huge questions regarding how large the debts are, exactly who’s going to get what help and when and who owes what to whom. History shows that the most effective rescues are those that recapitalize institutions and that allow the weak to fail, which is why I am particularly doubtful of the U.S. government’s plan to attain bad debt while pleasing weaker institutions that should be put out of their desolation. As so many of these programs are in progress that tax payers of US and investors have been caught in big trouble or they are being put on side. As a final verdict I would like to say things are going to get worse, before they can get better, this betterment can’t be even expected before mid of 2009.
Maaz, freelancer of the Ecommerce Journal
thank you
That's laughable Who would stop chris paul?...stockton? porno izle branda Come on... The only advantage they would have is down low and That's laughable Who would stop chris paul?...stockton? porno izle branda Come on... The only advantage they would have is down low and porno we all know the european game is based on the yemek tarifleri perimeter..not to mention branda the level of motivation the redeem team would be
siki? playing agaisnt the dream team ..redeem team by ten Cook, travesti but I condone what he's doing to the fullest. If A guy can play in the nba, it's executives pornolar will make it possible contract or not. It's all about building the porno best 15 man roster than you yourself sex izle truly believe can lead you to the promised land. Because gizli çekim of Jennings and all of the one-and-done players in porno izle college basketball a new limit will be enstore for all porno of us to complain about.
kuulder
the only important quality turkey site travesti A portal site that does not provide turkey enkaliteli quality of wood travesti
Let’s see—a real stock market